Amatuers look for inspiration

Via the Pace Gallery Blog.

Standing In: Me and Pistoletto's Standing Couple

Michaelangelo Pistoletto, Standing Man, Standing Woman with Hat, 1980

The contagion of self-portraiture carried on, from the mirrors of the Kiki Smith exhibition (reviewed here) to the mirrors of the contemporary art galleries at the Brooklyn Museum of Art. Pistoletto's two figures on mirror seem to be facing me and the red wall installation behind me. It looks like we are carrying on an awkward conversation, perhaps because I am in color while they are stuck in black and white.

If one is going to look at art, and think about art, and write about art, after a bit shouldn't that person join the art? Oscar Wilde said that “One should either be a work of art, or wear a work of art." Surely with a little smoke and mirrors, or maybe just mirrors, I can get past this silly division of art and life and do both.

"All that I desire to point out is the general principle that life imitates art far more than art imitates life." -Oscar Wilde 

Damien Hirst: Practice Makes Perfect

"Anyone can be like Rembrandt. I don't think a painter like Rembrandt is a genius. It's about freedom and guts. It's about looking. It can be learnt. That's the great thing about art. Anybody can do it if you just believe. With practice you can make great paintings."

The artist poses in front of his latest show

The Telegraph reports that Hirst: "made the comments as he defended himself from critics of his latest exhibition at the Wallace Collection in London, which has been described as "an embarrassment" and "shockingly bad". He admitted he had a long way to go before equalling the 17th century Dutch master, but dismissed the idea that Rembrandt was a genius and claimed that, with practice, he could learn to paint like him."



While I might not entirely disagree with Hirst's comment, it's hilarious that he is getting defensive now. Apparently putting animals in formaldehyde for ridiculous amounts of money required no comment. He really branched out with his work, and kudos to him for taking that kind of risk. At the same time his idealism- anybody can be a great painter if they just believe- isn't working here, at least according to the critics. Maybe he needs more practice?